|
This section is widgetized. If you would like to add content to this section, you may do so by using the Widgets panel from within your WordPress Admin Dashboard. This Widget Section is called "1200 Home - Image - 1 - Left Sidebar"
This section is widgetized. If you would like to add content to this section, you may do so by using the Widgets panel from within your WordPress Admin Dashboard. This Widget Section is called "1200 Home - Image - 1 - Right Sidebar"
|
Here is the school choice editorial from SHJ from 2009! Let’s see if there are any similarities.
LIE #1 – Only for the rich. – CHECK
The biggest beneficiaries would have been the well-off taxpayers who are zoned for public schools that generally perform quite well, and choose to send their children to private schools anyway.
Poor people have little taxable income and derive little benefit from tax credits. That’s what being poor means.
Well Look Here! I thought Sunday’s editorial re: school choice was just a rehash of their 2010 editorial … I was wrong!
Of course yesterday’s blog post rightly noted that “According to the Florida Dept. of Education, almost 30,000 scholarships were awarded in 2010 through a bill similar to H4576. Those scholarships are based on students eligible through free/reduced lunch program criteria.”
LIE #2 – Public funds for private schools – CHECK
This year’s bill (and there has been one every year since 2004) was the worst yet of those created to make taxpayers fund private schools.
However the Supreme Court disagrees with the SHJ editors:
In the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent ruling in ACSTO v. Winn, the court held that money spent and claimed as a credit against one’s taxes is private money, not government spending. Other taxpayers aren’t harmed by the choice of those claiming credits because the government isn’t spending collective tax revenue. In other words, the taxpayer, not the state, is presumed to own the fruits of his own labor.
At what point does plagiarism become an issue? It seems as if someone is just going back to last year’s anti-parental choice editorials and mixing a few words around and reprinting. Hey SHJ! Doing you a favor here, pointing this out!
Michael Smith is the SHJ Editor. You can reach him at michael.smith@SHJ.com.
You can write a letter to the editor by sending less than 300 words, with your name, address, and a daytime phone # to opinion@shj.com.
IS THIS A GOOD BUY?
This is the conceptual plan for the recreation portion of Project North on Highway 11 between Walhalla and Westminster.
Call your Councilmen and come to the November 23 County Council Meeting at 6:00 PM. Go to:
www.oconeesc.com for more information including contact information for your councilman.
Concerned Citizens of the Upstate have gathered together to address the drift in our South Carolina Upstate toward principles that threaten our private property rights and may lead us down the slippery slope toward engineered population centers and government ownership of undeveloped land.